{"id":9315,"date":"2018-10-30T16:27:23","date_gmt":"2018-10-30T15:27:23","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/archivio.irpa.eu\/journal_article\/the-legal-design-of-judicial-review-systems-a-comparative-overview-2\/"},"modified":"2018-10-30T16:27:23","modified_gmt":"2018-10-30T15:27:23","slug":"the-legal-design-of-judicial-review-systems-a-comparative-overview-2","status":"publish","type":"journal_article","link":"https:\/\/archivio.irpa.eu\/en\/article\/the-legal-design-of-judicial-review-systems-a-comparative-overview-2\/","title":{"rendered":"The Legal Design of Judicial Review Systems: a Comparative Overview"},"content":{"rendered":"
Giulio Napolitano, Eduardo Jordao and Marco D Alberti discuss the topic of judicial review of administrative power. The scholars examine multi- farious aspects, such as the legal design of judicial review systems from a comparative perspective, legal indeterminacy, and the intensity of judicial review of administrative power.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Giulio Napolitano, Eduardo Jordao and Marco D Alberti discuss the topic of judicial review of administrative power. The scholars examine multi- farious aspects, such as the legal design of judicial review systems from a comparative perspective, legal indeterminacy, and the intensity of judicial review of administrative power.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"template":"","acf":[],"yoast_head":"\n