{"id":9084,"date":"2013-09-24T14:56:38","date_gmt":"2013-09-24T12:56:38","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/archivio.irpa.eu\/journal_article\/il-diritto-straniero-nella-giurisprudenza-costituzionale-metodi-forte-e-debole-a-confronto-2\/"},"modified":"2013-09-24T14:56:38","modified_gmt":"2013-09-24T12:56:38","slug":"il-diritto-straniero-nella-giurisprudenza-costituzionale-metodi-forte-e-debole-a-confronto-2","status":"publish","type":"journal_article","link":"https:\/\/archivio.irpa.eu\/en\/article\/il-diritto-straniero-nella-giurisprudenza-costituzionale-metodi-forte-e-debole-a-confronto-2\/","title":{"rendered":"Foreign Law in Constitutional Courts\u2019 Decisions: A Comparison"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>The article investigates the structure of constitutional legal reasoning<br \/>based on foreign law in a comparative perspective. A selection of judgments<br \/>from different supreme and constitutional courts are analyzed, to gain a more<br \/>comprehensive understanding of how judges use materials from foreign homologous<br \/>jurisdictions. This study illustrates that two different models of legal<br \/>reasoning based on foreign law are emerging on a global level: the \u201chard\u201d<br \/>mode and the \u201csoft\u201d mode.<br \/>The hard mode tends to transform foreign legal materials into rules that<br \/>are applicable to the domestic legal system. On the other hand, with the soft<br \/>mode, once judges have targeted relevant foreign cases, they tend to consider<br \/>the solutions thus yielded not compatible with the national constitutional<br \/>system. In this way, the soft mode transforms foreign judicial materials into<br \/>examples or hypothetical solutions for the judicial cases under scrutiny. The<br \/>article explores the advantages of this hermeneutic technique.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>&nbsp; The article investigates the structure of constitutional legal reasoningbased on foreign law in a comparative perspective. A selection of judgmentsfrom different supreme and constitutional courts are analyzed, to gain a morecomprehensive understanding of how judges use materials from foreign homologousjurisdictions. This study illustrates that two different models of legalreasoning based on foreign law are<\/p>\n","protected":false},"template":"","acf":[],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v19.14 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Foreign Law in Constitutional Courts\u2019 Decisions: A Comparison - IRPA<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/archivio.irpa.eu\/en\/article\/il-diritto-straniero-nella-giurisprudenza-costituzionale-metodi-forte-e-debole-a-confronto-2\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Foreign Law in Constitutional Courts\u2019 Decisions: A Comparison - IRPA\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"&nbsp; The article investigates the structure of constitutional legal reasoningbased on foreign law in a comparative perspective. A selection of judgmentsfrom different supreme and constitutional courts are analyzed, to gain a morecomprehensive understanding of how judges use materials from foreign homologousjurisdictions. This study illustrates that two different models of legalreasoning based on foreign law are\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/archivio.irpa.eu\/en\/article\/il-diritto-straniero-nella-giurisprudenza-costituzionale-metodi-forte-e-debole-a-confronto-2\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"IRPA\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"1 minute\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/archivio.irpa.eu\/en\/article\/il-diritto-straniero-nella-giurisprudenza-costituzionale-metodi-forte-e-debole-a-confronto-2\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/archivio.irpa.eu\/en\/article\/il-diritto-straniero-nella-giurisprudenza-costituzionale-metodi-forte-e-debole-a-confronto-2\/\",\"name\":\"Foreign Law in Constitutional Courts\u2019 Decisions: A Comparison - IRPA\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/archivio.irpa.eu\/en\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2013-09-24T12:56:38+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2013-09-24T12:56:38+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/archivio.irpa.eu\/en\/article\/il-diritto-straniero-nella-giurisprudenza-costituzionale-metodi-forte-e-debole-a-confronto-2\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/archivio.irpa.eu\/en\/article\/il-diritto-straniero-nella-giurisprudenza-costituzionale-metodi-forte-e-debole-a-confronto-2\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/archivio.irpa.eu\/en\/article\/il-diritto-straniero-nella-giurisprudenza-costituzionale-metodi-forte-e-debole-a-confronto-2\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/archivio.irpa.eu\/en\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Foreign Law in Constitutional Courts\u2019 Decisions: A Comparison\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/archivio.irpa.eu\/en\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/archivio.irpa.eu\/en\/\",\"name\":\"IRPA\",\"description\":\"Istituto di Ricerca sulla Pubblica Amministrazione\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/archivio.irpa.eu\/en\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":\"required name=search_term_string\"}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Foreign Law in Constitutional Courts\u2019 Decisions: A Comparison - IRPA","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/archivio.irpa.eu\/en\/article\/il-diritto-straniero-nella-giurisprudenza-costituzionale-metodi-forte-e-debole-a-confronto-2\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Foreign Law in Constitutional Courts\u2019 Decisions: A Comparison - IRPA","og_description":"&nbsp; The article investigates the structure of constitutional legal reasoningbased on foreign law in a comparative perspective. A selection of judgmentsfrom different supreme and constitutional courts are analyzed, to gain a morecomprehensive understanding of how judges use materials from foreign homologousjurisdictions. This study illustrates that two different models of legalreasoning based on foreign law are","og_url":"https:\/\/archivio.irpa.eu\/en\/article\/il-diritto-straniero-nella-giurisprudenza-costituzionale-metodi-forte-e-debole-a-confronto-2\/","og_site_name":"IRPA","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Est. reading time":"1 minute"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/archivio.irpa.eu\/en\/article\/il-diritto-straniero-nella-giurisprudenza-costituzionale-metodi-forte-e-debole-a-confronto-2\/","url":"https:\/\/archivio.irpa.eu\/en\/article\/il-diritto-straniero-nella-giurisprudenza-costituzionale-metodi-forte-e-debole-a-confronto-2\/","name":"Foreign Law in Constitutional Courts\u2019 Decisions: A Comparison - IRPA","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/archivio.irpa.eu\/en\/#website"},"datePublished":"2013-09-24T12:56:38+00:00","dateModified":"2013-09-24T12:56:38+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/archivio.irpa.eu\/en\/article\/il-diritto-straniero-nella-giurisprudenza-costituzionale-metodi-forte-e-debole-a-confronto-2\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/archivio.irpa.eu\/en\/article\/il-diritto-straniero-nella-giurisprudenza-costituzionale-metodi-forte-e-debole-a-confronto-2\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/archivio.irpa.eu\/en\/article\/il-diritto-straniero-nella-giurisprudenza-costituzionale-metodi-forte-e-debole-a-confronto-2\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/archivio.irpa.eu\/en\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Foreign Law in Constitutional Courts\u2019 Decisions: A Comparison"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/archivio.irpa.eu\/en\/#website","url":"https:\/\/archivio.irpa.eu\/en\/","name":"IRPA","description":"Istituto di Ricerca sulla Pubblica Amministrazione","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/archivio.irpa.eu\/en\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":"required name=search_term_string"}],"inLanguage":"en-US"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/archivio.irpa.eu\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/journal_article\/9084"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/archivio.irpa.eu\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/journal_article"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/archivio.irpa.eu\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/journal_article"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/archivio.irpa.eu\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=9084"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}